While I do like Michael Pollan’s
writing style, I believe his angst to make an interesting story occasionally
obstructs the scientific accuracy even if slightly. He made misstatement many
time when trying to convey a point but two on pages 20 and 21 made me want to
immediately point this out. The first is when he says “After water, carbon is
the most common element in our body”, well no carbon IS the most common
element, water isn’t an element. The second was when he said “It is more than a
figure of speech to say life is created out of thin air” air is a combination of
molecules many of which are not required for photosynthesis. This may be very nit-picky,
however when writing a book trying to make scientific points a certain level of
credibility needs to be maintained. It makes me nervous that he sacrifices that
for entertainment value. I enjoyed Pollans use of George the corn farmer from Iowa
in this book. He is the focus of Pollan early on, and he takes us through his
trip to Georges farm, but what I enjoyed was how Georges family and farm were
used. Michael continuously references Georges grandfather and father when
referencing historical periods in agriculture, this takes mundane history and
gives it more texture. I couldn’t help but feel bad for the cows in the feedlot
described by Michael. When he was describing how the corn they eat made them
bloat and develop sores in their intestines. It sounds extremely painful and makes
me question eating beef coming from feed lots. One thing I did not know that I
found fascinating was that the manure from these feedlot cows, which I thought
to be “farmers gold” was completely rejected by farmers due to high levels of
antibiotics, hormones and other chemicals.
Michael Pollan (2007). Omnivores & Dilemma: A
natural history of four meals. London,
United Kingdom: Penguin Books.
Even though Pollan may manage to make his point about how much abundant carbon is in our body, I think you are totally right to criticize the lack of accuracy in some statements, like the "water is an element". When writing a book with such educational objectives no scientific mistakes like this one should be made.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your capacity to point out relevant things like you did.